What is the true cost of recruitment for UK employers?

Recruitment often looks like a simple line in the budget. In reality, the cost of recruitment is a mix of visible spend and hidden effort, and it can climb fast for any business, especially when a role stays open for weeks. If you’re scaling, making your first hires, or replacing key team members, understanding what you really pay for (and why) helps you make the right decisions.

This guide breaks down the full picture: where the money goes, what employers commonly miss, and how to calculate a realistic cost per hire for your company, without turning it into a spreadsheet nightmare.

What counts as recruitment costs?

Recruitment costs usually fall into two categories: direct costs and indirect costs. Direct costs show up clearly (invoices, job ads, recruiting services). Indirect costs are often the bigger issue because they show up as “just work”, the hours managers and staff spend screening candidates, interviewing, chasing feedback, and covering gaps.

If you want to reduce costs without lowering hiring quality, this distinction matters. Most companies cut the obvious spend first, but the real savings often come from tightening the process and reducing time lost internally.

Direct recruitment costs

Direct costs are the easiest to spot because they’re paid out to someone: a job board, a recruitment agency, or a supplier. Typical examples include:

• Job advertising (job boards, paid social, niche sites)

• Recruitment agencies or headhunters

• Background checks and assessments

• Recruitment software and solutions

These costs can still be significant, especially in a competitive market or for specialist roles. But they’re only part of the story, and they’re rarely the biggest driver of the total cost over time.

Indirect recruitment costs

Indirect costs are the ones that quietly add up inside the company. They’re easy to overlook because they don’t always come with a price tag, but they still cost money in the form of time, delays, and additional pressure on teams.

Common indirect costs include:

• HR and manager time (shortlisting, interviews, approvals)

• Lost productivity while the role is vacant

• Overtime or temporary cover for the team

• Training and onboarding time

Early turnover and rehiring

👉 To note
A longer hiring process doesn’t just increase recruiting spend, it can also damage team performance and retention. When a role stays open, other workers pick up the slack, managers spend more time firefighting, and priorities slip. Often, speeding up decision-making has a bigger impact than cutting job ad budgets.

Recruitment costs at a glance

Build the right HR tech stack

Download software guide

Why time to hire increases recruitment costs

Time is one of the biggest multipliers in recruitment. Every additional week a vacancy stays open affects output, priorities, and morale, and it creates extra work across the business. Teams may rely on overtime, managers may spend more time coordinating, and projects slow down.

It also changes candidate behaviour. In a fast-moving market, strong candidates don’t wait forever. If you take too long to respond, you may lose the candidate; and the cycle starts again with a new search.

How to calculate your cost per hire

To calculate your cost per hire, start by grouping costs into two buckets:

1) External recruiting costs

• Job ads

• Agency fees

• Tools, checks, and assessments

2) Internal costs

• Time spent by HR and hiring managers

• Interview time across the team

• Admin and onboarding time

• Productivity loss while the role is unfilled

Then divide the total by the number of hires you made in a set period (for example, a quarter). This gives you a baseline you can track over time and use to make better decisions about what to improve.

If you want a simple way to begin, track just two inputs first: (1) external spend, and (2) the total hours your team spends per hire. That alone will already give you a clearer picture than most companies have today.

How can UK employers reduce recruitment costs?

Lowering recruitment costs doesn’t mean rushing hires or lowering standards. It’s about removing friction so the business can hire faster, and more consistently while giving candidates a better experience.

Here are practical levers that typically reduce costs without hurting quality:

• Clarify the role early (what “good” looks like in the first 90 days)

• Reduce delays between interview stages and decisions

• Use structured interviews so the team can compare candidates fairly

• Build a pipeline so you’re not always starting from zero

• Improve onboarding so a new hire becomes productive faster

You don’t need a perfect system on day one. Even small improvements, like cutting one interview stage or agreeing decision criteria upfront, can reduce the additional time and internal workload that drives recruitment cost up.

Want to experience the future of HR management?

Book a demo